4 New HCPCS Modifiers in Lieu of the -59 Modifier

by | Posted: Oct 28, 2014 | Medical Coding

Share this post:

CMS is introducing four new HCPCS (Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System) modifiers to identify subsets of modifier 59 that is used to designate a “distinct procedural service”. The new subset modifiers are designed specifically to reduce the improper use of modifier 59 and improve claims processing for providers.

The most extensively used HCPCS modifier, modifier 59 can be used in a number of circumstances. It is infamous for widespread misuse and high levels of manual audit activity and has often resulted in appeals, civil fraud and abuse cases, and reviews. Often, this modifier is used inappropriately to evade NCCI (National Correct Coding Initiative) edits. It is hoped that the establishment of the subset modifiers will reduce the wrong use of modifier 59. The new subsets are also expected to improve claims processing for healthcare providers. The following are the new modifiers referred to together as -X {EPSU} modifiers and represent specific subsets of the -59 modifier.

  • XE Separate Encounter: A service that is distinct because it occurred during a separate encounter
  • XS Separate Structure: A service that is distinct because it was performed on a separate organ/structure
  • XP Separate Practitioner: A service that is distinct because it was performed by a different practitioner
  • XU Unusual Non-Overlapping Service: The use of a service that is distinct because it does not overlap usual components of the main service

CMS will continue to accept modifier 59 in many instances. However, according to CPT instructions, modifier -59 should not be used when a more specific and descriptive modifier is available for billing certain codes that are at high risk for inappropriate and erratic billing. Since the -X {EPSU} modifiers are more definitive versions of modifier -59, it would be incorrect to report both modifiers on the same line.

This change will be effective from January 5, 2015. Initially, either modifier 59 or an X {EPSU} modifier will be accepted. However, CMS requests providers to quickly start using the more selective modifiers.

Natalie Tornese

Join Us Our Newsletter

Stay informed with our latest updates and insights.


By submitting, you consent to receive emails with a SafeUnsubscribe® link included.

Related Posts

Most Common CDT Coding Mistakes

Most Common CDT Coding Mistakes

A dentist’s clinical decisions guide the procedures performed, but accurate documentation using the correct CDT codes is crucial for proper claim submission and reimbursement. Every procedure must be documented in both the patient’s dental record and the claim form...

How to Code for Dermatomyositis – A Common Rheumatology Disorder

How to Code for Dermatomyositis – A Common Rheumatology Disorder

Regarded as a chronic inflammatory disease, dermatomyositis affects the muscles and skin. It can affect adults and children and is most commonly seen in females than males. Accurate and compliant medical billing and coding is critical not only for appropriate...

ICD-10 Coding for Thrombophilia: Best Practices & Common Pitfalls

ICD-10 Coding for Thrombophilia: Best Practices & Common Pitfalls

Thrombophilia is a medical condition that increases the risk of developing abnormal blood clots in the veins or arteries. Accurate ICD-10 coding for thrombophilia is crucial for proper documentation, appropriate billing, and optimal patient care. Following the right...