Ophthalmology Medical Coding Myths Pertaining to Foreign Body Removal

by | Last updated Jun 16, 2023 | Published on Feb 1, 2012 | Specialty Coding

Ophthalmology Medical Coding
Share this:

This article looks at three ophthalmology medical coding myths that could be causing coding errors and affecting payments.

Be Careful When You Code FBRs

First Myth – All Foreign Body Removals (FBRs) within a single eye are clubbed together, which means an FBR code can only be coded once per eye.

The Actuality – It is true that a coder cannot separately report removal of many foreign bodies from the same region of the eye. However, if the ophthalmologist has removed foreign bodies from different regions of the same eye (such as the conjunctiva and cornea) codes can be separately reported for each region. The ophthalmologist should draw a comprehensive figure of the eye that makes clear the specific region and depth of the removed FBRs. If the ophthalmologist has taken out an embedded conjunctival foreign body, you can report a code in 65210 which offers higher reimbursement. This is good news for both coder and physician.

Second Myth – A foreign body diagnosis can be coded even if the examination doesn’t reveal a foreign body.

The Actuality – It is not correct to report a foreign body ICD-9 code (930.0-930.9, Foreign body on external eye) when a foreign body has not come up in the ophthalmologist’s exam. However, coding can be done for the sensation of a foreign body, with an eye pain code (for example 379.91).

Third Myth – The kind of instrument the ophthalmologist uses establishes which FBR code to report.

The Actuality – The FBR series of codes (65205 to 65222) make no mention of a specific instrument to take out the FB. Nevertheless, CPT® code 65222 (Removal of foreign body, external eye; corneal, with slit lamp) does point out the equipment utilized to make viewing the affected area easier. If the ophthalmologist made use of a slit lamp to see the corneal foreign body, the code to be used is 65222. If he didn’t use a slit lamp, the code is 65220.

Outsource to Minimize Errors

To ensure that your medical coding process is not affected by myths or errors that can even cause claim denials, it is best to outsource this process to experts. Do research to find an HIPAA compliant outsourcing company with a good reputation, a superior track record and an extensive client base.

  • Natalie Tornese
    Natalie Tornese
    CPC: Director of Revenue Cycle Management

    Natalie joined MOS’ Revenue Cycle Management Division in October 2011. She brings twenty five years of hands on management experience to the company.

  • Meghann Drella
    Meghann Drella
    CPC: Senior Solutions Manager: Practice and RCM

    Meghann joined MOS’ Revenue Cycle Management Division in February of 2013. She is CPC certified with the American Academy of Professional Coders (AAPC).

  • Amber Darst
    Amber Darst
    Solutions Manager: Practice and RCM

    Hired for her dental expertise, Amber brings a wealth of knowledge and understanding of the dental revenue cycle management (RCM) services to MOS.

  • Loralee Kapp
    Loralee Kapp
    Solutions Manager: Practice and RCM

    Loralee joined MOS’ Revenue Cycle Management Division in October 2021. She has over five years of experience in medical coding and Health Information Management practices.